When you deal with sensitive financial data, every detail matters. The tools you use need to be just as reliable as the insights you provide. That’s why choosing the right AI note-taking app isn’t just about features — it’s about security, efficiency, and trust.
Financial experts, portfolio managers, and investment bankers handle information that requires the highest level of confidentiality. A single data leak can lead to serious consequences. That makes picking the right AI note-taker a decision you can’t take lightly.
Obsidian and Zocks are two popular AI note-taking tools, each offering unique features. But when security, ease of use, and functionality are all on the line, how do you know which one’s right for you? Let’s take a closer look at how they compare.
Both Obsidian and Zocks offer powerful AI note-taking features, but they cater to different needs. Obsidian focuses on customization and control, while Zocks prioritizes simplicity and speed. Here’s a side-by-side comparison to help you decide.
Feature
Obsidian
Zocks
Data Storage
Local, stored on your device
Cloud-based storage
Security
High — no third-party servers
Moderate — cloud risks
Customization
Extensive with plugins
Limited customization
Ease of use
Steep learning curve
User-friendly, quick setup
Collaboration
Limited real-time options
Seamless real-time collaboration
Search capability
Basic search functionality
AI-powered smart search
Visual tools
Graph view for note links
Automated organization and tagging
Obsidian stands out as a powerful note-taking and knowledge management tool designed for users who value customization and control. Its local-first approach keeps your data stored on your device, offering an added layer of privacy. Obsidian’s flexibility comes from its wide range of plugins and features that allow you to tailor the app to your needs. Whether you’re building a personal knowledge base or managing complex information, Obsidian provides a unique blend of speed and organization.
Though it’s feature-rich, Obsidian does come with a learning curve. Its extensive customization options require some technical know-how, and collaboration features are limited. Still, for individuals who prioritize security and control over cloud-based convenience, Obsidian is a strong contender in the AI note-taking space.
Obsidian offers a flexible pricing model with a solid free plan and optional add-ons for more advanced features.
Students, faculty, and nonprofit workers get a 40% discount on Sync and Publish add-ons. There’s also a 14-day free trial for premium features.
Zocks is designed to help financial professionals stay fully engaged during client interactions without worrying about taking notes. It captures essential details from conversations—both virtual and in-person—without requiring recordings. This ensures privacy while still providing accurate documentation.
By integrating seamlessly with CRM systems, Zocks automates follow-ups, task management, and communication workflows. It helps financial experts track client financial goals, investment preferences, and life events without missing key details. For professionals handling sensitive financial data, Zocks offers a secure and efficient way to manage client relationships.
Zocks' pricing details aren’t publicly listed, as they likely offer custom plans based on business needs. Interested users can request a demo or contact their sales team for pricing information.
When choosing an AI note-taking tool, it’s important to find one that fits your specific needs—especially when dealing with sensitive financial data. Obsidian and Zocks both offer unique strengths, but they’re built with different users in mind. Let’s take a closer look at how they compare in terms of pricing, transcription, ease of use, and more.
Obsidian offers a flexible pricing structure with a robust free plan for personal use. For those who need more, add-ons like Obsidian Sync ($10/month) and Obsidian Publish ($10/site per month) provide advanced features like multi-device syncing and web publishing. Businesses must purchase a commercial license at $50 per user per year, but add-ons still cost extra. Discounts are available for students, faculty, and nonprofit workers.
Zocks, on the other hand, doesn’t publicly list its pricing. This suggests a more customized approach, likely tailored to the needs of financial professionals and larger businesses. Prospective users can request a demo or contact their sales team for detailed pricing information.
Obsidian focuses on manual note-taking with powerful markdown support and knowledge management features. It doesn’t offer live transcription but excels at helping users organize and connect their notes through backlinks and customizable workflows.
Zocks captures conversation details in real-time—without the need for recordings. This feature is especially valuable for financial professionals who need to maintain privacy and avoid storing sensitive audio data. By analyzing discussions and automatically pulling out key insights, Zocks saves time and ensures no important detail is missed.
Obsidian offers a clean, fast interface with extensive customization options. Users can tailor the app’s appearance and functionality with themes and plugins, but this level of flexibility can come with a learning curve. It’s ideal for users comfortable with markdown and those who want a highly personalized workspace.
Zocks is built for simplicity and efficiency. Its real-time analysis and automatic CRM integration minimize manual input, making it easy to stay focused during client meetings. Because it’s designed for financial professionals, its features align closely with their workflows, reducing setup and training time.
Obsidian is primarily a solo knowledge management tool. While it supports shared vaults, it lacks built-in collaboration features like live editing. Users often rely on third-party plugins for team functionality, which can complicate setup.
Zocks shines in team environments. Its CRM integration ensures that client data flows seamlessly between team members, keeping everyone aligned on follow-ups and action items. Automated task management helps teams stay organized and responsive without manual effort.
For financial experts, data security is non-negotiable. Obsidian offers local-first storage, meaning your notes are saved on your device by default, reducing cloud-related risks. However, add-ons like Obsidian Sync involve cloud storage, which may raise concerns for highly sensitive information.
Zocks takes privacy a step further by capturing conversation insights without recording audio. This approach minimizes data exposure and aligns with strict confidentiality requirements often found in finance. Its CRM integration ensures secure data handling across your organization’s systems.
Both Obsidian and Zocks offer powerful features, but they cater to different needs. Choosing the right one depends on how you take notes and the kind of work you do. Let’s break down which tool is better for different users.
Obsidian is perfect for tech-savvy users who want full control over their notes and a highly customizable workspace. Its local storage and end-to-end encrypted cloud syncing offer excellent data security, while its flexible interface lets you organize information exactly how you want.
That said, Obsidian’s learning curve and lack of rich-text formatting can be a drawback for those who prefer a more intuitive interface. It’s also better suited for solo work than team collaboration.
Zocks is designed for professionals who need to stay fully engaged during client interactions without worrying about note-taking. Its real-time analysis and CRM integration make it a powerful tool for managing client relationships and follow-ups.
Zocks’ focus on client management makes it ideal for teams working in finance or advisory roles. Its automation features save time and keep everyone aligned on follow-ups and next steps.
Both Obsidian and Zocks bring unique strengths to the table, but the best choice depends on how you work and what you need from a note-taking tool. Obsidian shines with its advanced features, customization, and local storage, making it perfect for personal projects and detailed documentation. On the other hand, Zocks is built for client-focused professionals who need real-time insights and automated workflows without losing the personal touch.
If you’re still unsure which tool fits your needs, Knapsack offers a fresh alternative worth exploring. It combines powerful organization features with an intuitive interface, making it a great option for teams and individuals alike.
Ready to take your productivity to the next level? Try out Obsidian, Zocks, or Knapsack and see which one helps you work smarter and stay organized.
How Knapsack Helps With Private Meeting Transcription
Secure your conversations with Knapsack's private meeting transcription. AI-powered accuracy, privacy-first approach. Try now.
AI for Personalized Financial Advice
Explore how AI for personalized financial advice tailors investment strategies, enhances decision-making, and improves client satisfaction.
How is Generative AI Changing Finance?
Discover how generative AI in finance is transforming decision-making, improving efficiency, and enhancing financial services.